Efeito da variação da geometria do casco na resistência ao avanço e nos movimentos de uma barcaça regional
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade do Estado do Amazonas
Resumo
The Amazon region has several inland navigation activities related to the transportation
of cargo on river barges. However, there is still a lack of technical studies related to the hy drodynamic behavior of this type of vessel. In order to investigate the operational aspects
of regional river barges, a comparative study was conducted, aiming to analyze several
hydrodynamic characteristics of a regional barge hull. The effect of the change of the bow
and stern hull inclination of a regional cargo transport barge on the hydrostatic characte ristics, ship resistance and motions was evaluated using simplified methods. Hydrostatic
characteristics such as displacement, metacentric radius and height were analyzed. For
the analysis of ship resistance, methods of practical use were evaluated (i.e., Holtrop and
KR Barge), discussing the restrictions and limitations of each. Finally, the uncoupled
motions of heave and pitch in regular waves were analyzed. For comparison purposes in
each of these topics, a reference barge case was modeled, changing the inclination of the
bow and stern of the hull, totaling four case studies. To perform the analysis, the soft ware Maxsurf and its utility packages Modeler, Resistance and Motions were used in the
analysis of hydrostatics, ship resistance and motions in waves. Regarding the hydrostatic
characteristics, study case 2 (inclination of 30° in the bow and 48° in the stern) and study
case 4 (12° bow and 14° stern) presented better performance in relation to the standard
case (17° bow and 21° stern), presenting a variation of 7.13% in cross-sectional metacen tric height for case 4 and -6.21% for case 2. Similarly, in the analysis of ship resistance
using the method of Holtrop, case 2 presented variations between 13.7% and 39.3% and
the case 4 variations between -6.7% and -25% in relation to the standard case. The KR
Barge method overestimated the reference ship resistance values due to its limitations for
practical implementation. For the significant accelerations in heave motion, study case 3
(14° bow and 17° stern) showed a variation of 2.17% and case 4 (12° bow and 14° stern)
a variation of 4.56% with respect to the reference case, both operating at a speed of 1
knot. With the results obtained regarding river barges, it is expected that the work will
add to the research on inland navigation in the Amazon region.
