Prevalência de lesões imunologicamente mediadas da cavidade oral diagnosticadas em um serviço de anatomia patológica de referência

dc.contributor.advisorLioney Nobre Cabral
dc.contributor.advisor-latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8956633114853772
dc.contributor.authorAlho, Lucas Mateus Oliveira
dc.contributor.author-latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9467183973447141
dc.contributor.referee1Lioney Nobre Cabral
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8956633114853772
dc.contributor.referee2Vasconcelos II, Antonio Jorge Araújo de
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5548562970182242
dc.contributor.referee3Barroso, Mara Lilian Sevalho
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3480508540885994
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-20T18:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-26
dc.description.abstractImmunologically mediated oral lesions comprise a group of disorders of considerable clinical relevance due to their chronic nature, potential impact on patients' quality of life, and the need for accurate diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these lesions diagnosed at the Oral Pathology and Anatomical Pathology Service of the State University of Amazonas (SEPAT-UEA) between 2012 and 2024, as well as to describe their epidemiological and clinical characteristics. This was an observational, retrospective, and descriptive study based on the analysis of archived histopathological reports. Information regarding diagnosis, sex, age, race/ethnicity, anatomical location, primary lesions, and referring institution was collected. Data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel® and statistically analyzed with Jamovi® software, applying absolute and relative frequencies, descriptive measures, and Fisher's Exact Test to evaluate associations between categorical variables. Oral lichen planus was the most frequent diagnosis (33.3%), followed by lichenoid reactions (29.4%), mucous membrane pemphigoid (17.6%), pemphigus vulgaris (15.7%), and bullous pemphigoid (3.9%). A predominance of female patients (80.4%) and middle- aged and older adults was observed. No statistically significant associations were found between diagnoses and sex (p=0.738) or race/ethnicity (p=0.299). Regarding anatomical location, statistically significant associations were observed for the gingiva (p<0.001) and lower lip (p=0.040). It was concluded that oral lichen planus and lichenoid reactions were the most frequently diagnosed immunologically mediated lesions during the study period, predominantly affecting female and middle-aged to older patients. Furthermore, anatomical location proved to be relevant for diagnostic assessment, reinforcing the importance of clinicopathological correlation in establishing definitive diagnoses for these disorders.
dc.description.resumoAs lesões imunologicamente mediadas da cavidade oral constituem um grupo de enfermidades de relevante interesse clínico devido ao seu caráter crônico, potencial impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes e necessidade de diagnóstico preciso. O presente estudo teve como objetivo determinar a prevalência dessas lesões diagnosticadas pelo Serviço de Anatomia Patológica e Patologia Bucal da Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (SEPAT-UEA) entre os anos de 2012 e 2024, bem como descrever suas características epidemiológicas e clínicas. Tratou-se de um estudo observacional, retrospectivo e descritivo, realizado por meio da análise de laudos histopatológicos arquivados no serviço. Foram coletadas informações referentes ao diagnóstico, sexo, idade, raça/cor, localização anatômica, lesões fundamentais e instituição remetente. Os dados foram tabulados no Microsoft Excel® e analisados estatisticamente no software Jamovi®, utilizando frequências absolutas e relativas, medidas descritivas e o Teste Exato de Fisher para avaliação das associações entre variáveis categóricas. O líquen plano oral constituiu o diagnóstico mais frequente (33,3%), seguido pelas reações liquenóides (29,4%), penfigoide das membranas mucosas (17,6%), pênfigo vulgar (15,7%) e penfigoide bolhoso (3,9%). Observou-se predominância do sexo feminino (80,4%) e de pacientes adultos e idosos. Não foram observadas associações estatisticamente significativas entre os diagnósticos e as variáveis sexo (p=0,738) e raça/cor (p=0,299). Em relação à localização anatômica, verificou-se associação estatisticamente significativa para gengiva (p<0,001) e lábio inferior (p=0,040). Conclui-se que o líquen plano oral e as reações liquenóides foram as lesões imunologicamente mediadas mais frequentemente diagnosticadas no período analisado, com predomínio do sexo feminino e de pacientes adultos e idosos. Além disso, a localização anatômica demonstrou relevância para o direcionamento diagnóstico, reforçando a importância da correlação clínico-patológica no estabelecimento do diagnóstico definitivo dessas enfermidades.
dc.identifier.citationALHO, Lucas Mateus Oliveira. Prevalência de lesões imunologicamente mediadas da cavidade oral diagnosticadas em um serviço de anatomia patológica de referência. TCC (Bacharelado em Odontologia). Manaus, UEA, 2026
dc.identifier.urihttps://ri.uea.edu.br/handle/riuea/8591
dc.publisherUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas
dc.publisher.initialsUEA
dc.relation.references1 Brad W. Patologia oral e maxilofacial. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2016. 912 p. 2. 2 Torres JLM e Nascimento GJF. Percepção de cirurgiões-dentistas acerca de manifestações orais de doenças imunomediadas e autoimunes. Revista de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Buco-Maxilo-Facial, 2024; 24(1), 6-13. 3. 3 Saccucci M, Carlo GD, Bossù M, Giovarruscio F, Salucci A, Polimeni A. Autoimmune Diseases and Their Manifestations on Oral Cavity: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. J Immunol Res. 2018 May 27;2018:6061825. 4 Karthikeyini HM, et al. Oral mucosal lesions in the mouth as first sign of dermatological diseases and disorders. PubMed, 2024;19:Doc44–4. 5. 5 Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Shiv Pillai. Basic immunology: functions and disorders of the immune system. 5th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. 6. 6 Olejnik M, et al. The prevalence of contact hypersensitivity in patients with oral lichen planus. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postȩpy Dermatology and Allergology, 2022; 39(4): 668–74. 7 Spirito F, Dioguardi M, Caponio VC, Ambrosino M, Lo Muzio E, Lo Muzio L. Oral lichen planus in children: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Mar 1;29(2):e152-e162. 8 Xue JL, Fan MW, Wang SZ, Chen XM, Li Y, Wang L. A clinical study of 674 patients with oral lichen planus in China. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:467–72. 9 Eisen D. The clinical features, malignant potential, and systemic associations of oral lichen planus: a study of 723 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:207–14. 10 Alam F, Hamburger J. Oral mucosal lichen planus in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:209–14. 11 Hashemipour MA, Sheikhhoseini S, Afshari Z, Nassab ARG. The relationship between clinical symptoms of oral lichen planus and quality of life related to oral health. BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 13;24(1) 12 Nukaly HY, Halawani IR, Alghamdi MS, Alruwaili AG, Binhezaim, et al. Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review Navigating Etiologies, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnostics, and Therapeutic Approaches. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 Sep 5;13(17):5280–0 13 Femiano F, Cozzolino F, Gaeta GM, De Luca P, Perfetto B, Baroni A. Recent advances on the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus (OLP). The adhesion molecules. Minerva Stomatol. 1999;48:151–9 14 Deguchi M, Aiba S, Ohtani H, Nagura H, Tagami H. Comparison of the distribution and numbers of antigen-presenting cells among T-lymphocyte-mediated dermatoses: CD1a+, factor XIIIa+, and CD68+ cells in eczematous dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen planus and graft-versus-host disease. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002;294:297–302. 15 Eisen D, Carrozzo M, Bagan Sebastian JV, Thongprasom K. Number V Oral lichen planus: clinical features and management. Oral Dis. 2005; 11(6): 338- 49. 33 16 Ismail SB, Kumar SKS, Zain RB. Oral lichen planus and lichenoid reactions: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and malignant transformation. Journal of Oral Science. 2007;49(2):89-106.Barrett AJ, Le Blanc K. Prophylaxis of acute GVHD: manipulate the graft or the environment? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2008; 21(2):165–76. 17 Warnakulasuriya S. Clinical features and presentation of oral potentially malignant disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125(6): 582-90. 18 Babu, Cathy; Tamgadge, Sandhya1 ; Vidhale, Rutuja Gajanan; Pereira, Treville1 . Oral Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 12(3):p 162- 164, Jul–Sep 2024. 19 Taylor J, McMillan R, Shephard M, Setterfield J, Ahmed R, Carrozzo M, et al. World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI:A systematic review of the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;120:161– 71.e20. 20 Hasan S, Jangra J, Choudhary P. Current update on mucous membrane pemphigoid. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10:1787 21 Xu HH, Werth VP, Parisi E, Sollecito TP. Mucous membrane pemphigoid. Dent Clin North Am 2013;57:611–30. 22 Rashid H, Lamberts A, Borradori L, Alberti-Violetti S, Barry RJ, Caproni M, et al. European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV. 2021 Sep 1;35(9):1750–64 23 Akbarialiabad H, Schmidt E, Patsatsi A, Lim YL, Mosam A, Tasanen K, Yamagami J, Daneshpazhooh M, De D, Cardones ARG, Joly P, Murrell DF. Bullous pemphigoid. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Feb 20;11(1):12. 24 Mariotti F, Pira A, De Luca N, Giampetruzzi AR, Russo F, Cerri A, Gasparini G, Cozzani E, Marzano AV, Antiga E, Caproni M, Quaglino P, Carrozzo M, Didona B, Di Zenzo G. Bullous pemphigoid and mucous membrane pemphigoid humoral responses differ in reactivity towards BP180 midportion and BP230. Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 29;15:1494294. 25 Batistella EÂ, Sabino da Silva R, Rivero ERC, Silva CAB. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021 Sep;50(8):750-757. 26 Geng RSQ, Sibbald RG. Pemphigus vulgaris: clinical aspects and treatments. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025;38(5):232–238. 27 Cura MJ, Torre AC, Cueto Sarmiento KY, Bollea Garlatti ML, Riganti J, Puga MC, Mazzuoccolo LD. Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Clinical Features, Treatments, and Outcomes. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020 Jun;111(5):398-407 34 28 González-Moles MÁ, Warnakulasuriya S, González-Ruiz I, Ayén Á, Lenouvel D, Ruiz- Ávila I, et al. Worldwide prevalence of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Oral Dis. 2021;27(4):813–828. 29 Batistella EA, Aoki V, Miyake RK, et al. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(1):6–17. 30 Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):320–332.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectPênfigo
dc.subjectPenfigoide
dc.subjectLíquem plano
dc.subjectPatologia bucal
dc.titlePrevalência de lesões imunologicamente mediadas da cavidade oral diagnosticadas em um serviço de anatomia patológica de referência
dc.title.alternativePrevalence of immunologically mediated oral cavity lesions diagnosed at a reference pathology service
dc.typeTrabalho de Conclusão de Curso

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Prevalência_de_lesões.pdf
Tamanho:
885.81 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format