Filicídio e discursos produzidos sobre esse crime no campo jurídico amazonense
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade do Estado do Amazonas
Resumo
Filicide as an expression of intrafamily violence brings a disturbing reality, since it calls into
question the belief in the environment and family relations as absent from conflicts and power
relations. This dissertation aims to understand the occurrence of filicides in the context of
intrafamily violence in Amazonas, based on the judicial processes collected in the.
(Automation System of Justice) of the Amazon Court of Justice (TJAM) seeking to discourses
produced in the legal field on this type of crime. For the construction of the same, a
bibliographical research on the subject was carried out in books, articles, repositories of
dissertations and theses to assist the preparation of literature review; and documentary
research, with collection of processes involving filicides processed and judged by the TJAM,
in the period from 2010 to 2015, whose speeches were analyzed in light of the technique of
Foucaultian discourse analysis. The six processes analyzed indicate that children were the
main targets of filicides. The motivations for the crime are diverse, but mainly involve the
recurrent practice of physical violence (beatings). It is noted that physical violence is seen by
parents as an educational element, although serious this fact is little questioned or discussed in
the processes. Among the social problems identified in the processes as present in the
intrafamiliar environment is the involvement with illicit activities, consumption of drugs and
drink by the parents, who are the main perpetrators of violence. It was observed during the
reading and analysis of the processes that the philicides the speeches elaborated in the legal
field, on the problem, expose only general aspects, a superficial look privileging a
conservative view on the crime. The discourses produced reveal the imbalance between the
agents that compose the field, there is an excessive appreciation of the positions and in the
decisions one realizes the use of moral and political aspects that are transformed in legalformal discourses. This statement can be seen in the common use of the jail appeal anchored
in the idea of need for maintenance of public order when it is not always threatened. It is
common to capture knowledge from other fields, such as the psychiatric-psychiatrist to
sediment certain discourses. In a very subtle way there is a double silencing of the violence
suffered by the victims before and after their deaths, perhaps because there is no typification
or because of the volume of cases, the cases are judged as common homicides, without being
considered important aspects of the family contexts where they occurred the violence.
Decisions that deviate from the commonly adopted truth-production regime can be considered
outsiders.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Citação
Avaliação
Revisão
Suplementado Por
Referenciado Por
Licença Creative Commons
Exceto quando indicado de outra forma, a licença deste item é descrita como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil